Monday 30 November 2015

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF BIG BUCKS, BIG PHARMA; MARKETING DISEASES AND PUSHING DRUGS






Big Bucks, Big Pharma; Marketing Diseases and Pushing Drugs is a documentary video about the activities of big pharmaceutical companies who operate internationally and how those activities impact the global health sector- from doctors to patients, from government to researchers and medical students.
From the documentary, some of the activities of Big Pharma (the name given to the entire global pharmaceutical corporation) that we discover include: branding and marketing drugs in the way that cosmetics would be branded thereby neglecting the health factor; rebranding old and neglected drugs to make them more appealing to patients and also more expensive; disregarding the side effects of drugs; advertising new diseases to enhance purchase of old drugs, etcetera.
What we see is a near-conspiracy of owners and investors of big pharmaceutical companies to constantly convince their publics that they are ill and to make sure that they remain so in order to sell their products and make profit. At no stage in this process, is the health of the patient considered. In fact, we are given the impression that a healthy patient is a sign of depreciation of profit, therefore these organisations make sure that patients remain unhealthy. They achieve this, among other ways, by convincing their targets through advertisement that certain normal conditions could be ailments. An example of this is seen in the advertisement of “Generalised Anxiety Disorder” in the video. By telling targets to “ask your doctor” about the drugs that are being pushed, the documentary suggests that doctors are influenced and a connection is created between them and the drugs. Consequently, they prescribe more due to the subtle demands from their patients whose influence come from the advertisements. Medical students are consciously ushered into this system even before they begin their practice by way of being given free branded apparatus by Big Pharma as they graduate.
Big Pharma’s investors include wealthy individuals, government institutions and agencies, stakeholders of medical associations, medical researchers and food and drugs organisations. This suggests that the institutions in charge of the health of the public, and who should serve as watchdogs to keep organisations such as Big Pharma and their activities in check are all compromised. Apparently, when the checks of these institutions halt any activity of Big Pharma, their own pay checks will be affected. Therefore, this supposedly rogue process easily by-passes authority into the global health system.
In a global era where, actions at a distance affects others irrespective, it implies that Big Pharma’s activities affect locals in Africa where most people are oblivious of its existence to the extent of penetrating remote villages. Take for instance the issue of a young African woman in her early 20s and just out of college who develops stomach ulcer. Her doctor prescribes Nexium (or the purple pill) which is actually Prilosec that has been repackaged. Both doctor and patient are oblivious of that fact as well as the fact that the prescription was part of the first batch of experimental Nexium pills sent to Africa while Big Pharma and their researches waited to see what reports arose. Beside, Nexium unlike Prilosec has a greater risk of heart attack.
The case of Big Pharma is a globalization of investment, trade, health care and disease. It is also a typical case of the evils of modernization. Modernization has shifted the mode of health care from herbs and concoctions to the production and purchase of pills whose production include chemicals that are harsh to the human body. Televising is also an element of modernization which allows for the broadcast of these pills and sensitization of the public. This process which has been in existence for the long term and doesn’t seem to be exiting anytime, has become “how it’s done”. However, little do people appreciate that “how it’s done” is causing loss of lives to the majority while it fills the pockets of a very small minority.
“Ultimately, ‘Big Bucks, Big Pharma’ challenges us to ask important questions about the consequences of relying on a for-profit industry for our health and well-being”. For Africa where the validity of everything Western is seldom questioned, the question would be whether it is good enough practice to resort to foreign solution to a problem as sensitive as health especially when we still have ample access to natural resolutions.
‘Big Bucks, Big Pharma’ does not directly tackle the issue of globalisation and health but these are intricate in the issues addressed and questions raised throughout the documentary.
SOURCES
·         Big Bugs, Big Pharma; Marketing Disease and Pushing Drugs
·         www.mediaed.org
·         Deadly Medicines and Organized crime: How big Pharma has corrupted healthcare (A Summary), Peter Gotzsche